Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2345678 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 78
  1. #51
    75+ Posting Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    97
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    ok thanks John, so i will try to shorten the scan rate. Is it usefull to install the version 1.7 ?
    Phil.

  2. #52
    150+ Forum Groupie sas550's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    209
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    Bear in mind also that in fs 2004 you don't get a reflection of what you actually see on the screen. That's a function that will work in FSX as P Dowson told us some reply's back in this thread. I'm not sure to why it doesn't show the "true" image. Maybee Pete can fill us in if he reads this?
    Regards Anders Eriksson


    www.simcockpit.se

    FS9

  3. #53
    300+ Forum Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    496
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    Quote Originally Posted by sas550 View Post
    Bear in mind also that in fs 2004 you don't get a reflection of what you actually see on the screen. That's a function that will work in FSX as P Dowson told us some reply's back in this thread. I'm not sure to why it doesn't show the "true" image. Maybee Pete can fill us in if he reads this?
    Well, you are misinterpreting what I said a little.

    In all versions of FS (those which have cloud graphics), the clouds are placed randomly in the region corresponding to the Weather Station position reporting those clouds. Of course they then move in the wind, so that eventually the weather reported at each station changes too, with possibly different cloud layers etc.

    All FSUIPC could do was extract the reports from the WX stations - basically, not a lot more than you get from downloading the METARs from the web. METARs do not say "here's a cloud, there's a cloud", they say "there are these sorts of clouds covering n/8ths of the sky at this (base) altitude".

    So, a weather radar screen can only show a representation of that. For distant stations that's no problem, a simple representation is good enough. It only gets awkward close up, because the radar cannot show the exact position of each cloud, or bunch of clouds.

    Since the clouds do actually have to have a position, there is, obviously, somewhere in FS a record of where they are. This has to be retained to get them moving in the wind.

    In FS9 the maker of Reality XP gauges did actually crack the internal coding for clouds, and his weather gauges are therefore more detailed and very sophisticated compared to the AOG gauges, which use the basic WX station data FSUIPC provides. Naturally, RXP kept their knowledge of how to extract the data a trade secret, and I've never had the time (or inclination, really) to do the same investigation myself.

    This changes in FSX simply because, as a result of my early requests about this, Microsoft have provided a way to read the actual cloud data via SimConnect. This is a new facility in FSX, and it isn't used by FSUIPC simply because it would need a complete new way of handling the WX information in any case by any program using it. That being the case (i.e. the application, SA_WXR for instance, needing re-writing), the programs requiring this new data might as well interface direct to SimConnect. Going through FSUIPC for FSX-only data makes little sense -- FSUIPC is for compatibility.

    So, yes, it *can* be better / different in FSX, but it would need a new re-written version of SA_WXR.

    Hope this is now clear!?

    Regards

    Pete

  4. #54
    150+ Forum Groupie sas550's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    209
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    Tnx alot. That was an excellent explanation.
    Regards Anders Eriksson


    www.simcockpit.se

    FS9

  5. #55
    500+ This must be a daytime job JBaymore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wilton, New Hampshire USA
    Posts
    601
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Dowson View Post
    In FS9 the maker of Reality XP gauges did actually crack the internal coding for clouds, and his weather gauges are therefore more detailed and very sophisticated compared to the AOG gauges, which use the basic WX station data FSUIPC provides. Naturally, RXP kept their knowledge of how to extract the data a trade secret, and I've never had the time (or inclination, really) to do the same investigation myself.
    It is too bad that Reality XP does not make a "stand alone" networkable weather radar gauge....only "in-sim" installable panels. Sigh.

    best,

    .................john

  6. #56
    75+ Posting Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    97
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    does someone know how that the tilt angle can be changed on the ND while i'm inside my cockpit, as the sa wxr screen stands outside on my pc screen ? Are there hardware solutions for this, or programming needed ?
    Phil.

  7. #57
    150+ Forum Groupie sas550's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    209
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    This is copied from another thread on the subject.
    Quote:



    Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:37 pm Post subject:

    Hello again.

    I wish this report frees many people from a trouble.

    Specifications of tilt setting of SA_WXR may be different from a manual.
    It is written in a manual as follows.

    +-------------+-----------------+
    |Command Value| Function |
    +-------------+-----------------+
    | 17 |Set Tilt positive|
    +-------------+-----------------+
    | 18 |Set Tilt negative|
    +-------------+-----------------+

    However, I used only positive setting.
    For example, I write an order like next, and please test it.

    15=P1,8,Cx31006D01,x003C0001
    16=P1,8,Cx01006D00,x11
    17=P1,9,Cx41006D01,xFFC40001
    18=P1,9,Cx01006D00,x11

    I think that a good result was provided.

    I edited FSUIPC.INI and wrote in it.
    This read over Advanced Users.doc of FSUIPC again and hit.
    Please test it once by all means.
    And please tell it about the result.
    I wait for a nice report.

    Motoyasu Hattori
    Gifu Japan


    I have tested it and it works flawless when assigned to a joybutton. Just change the first digits to suit the order in wich the button presses are sorted in fsuipc.ini. The digit 8 in the two first lines and 9 in the third/fourth line is the button numbers. They obviusly have to be changed to your button number.

    There are some hints in the "Fsuipc for advanced users" section that covers additonal fs controls added by Fsuipc.
    Regards Anders Eriksson


    www.simcockpit.se

    FS9

  8. #58
    75+ Posting Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    97
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    Where should i put these lines in the fsuipc.ini?
    15=P1,8,Cx31006D01,x003C0001
    16=P1,8,Cx01006D00,x11
    17=P1,9,Cx41006D01,xFFC40001
    18=P1,9,Cx01006D00,x11
    Phil.

  9. #59
    300+ Forum Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    496
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    Quote Originally Posted by phil. View Post
    Where should i put these lines in the fsuipc.ini?
    15=P1,8,Cx31006D01,x003C0001
    16=P1,8,Cx01006D00,x11
    17=P1,9,Cx41006D01,xFFC40001
    18=P1,9,Cx01006D00,x11
    Phil.
    They are Button definitions, so in the [Buttons] section. Add it if you've not already assigned any buttons.

    Bear in mind that the 1,8 and 1,9 parts may not apply to your buttons. Best go into the Buttons tab in FSUIPC options and press them, see what Joystick/Button numbers come up. You can still then edit the INI, without closing FS, and tell FSUIPC to reload all button definitions (there's a screen button for that, you'll see it).

    Pete

  10. #60
    75+ Posting Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    97
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    i got here the explenation how to use it with Fsuipcb, but i don't understand a thing of it. what to do here ?
    Attached Files Attached Files

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2345678 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. SA_WXR Version 1.7 Now available
    By Trevor Hale in forum MyCockpit News and Announcements
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-25-2011, 06:21 PM
  2. Sa_wxr 1.6 no wxr
    By gandofalcon in forum PM General Q & A
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-19-2009, 05:05 PM
  3. SA_WXR and PMGetWeather
    By FlightsimBerlin in forum PM General Q & A
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-11-2009, 05:13 PM
  4. Sa_wxr 1.6??
    By Pierre24 in forum PM General Q & A
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-05-2008, 04:49 AM