SIOC "IF" Question

[Boeing 747 Flyer]

Hi Jim,

As far as I can see, that script looks good to me. Have I made an error? I cannot see anything visually wrong.

EDIT: This post was edited, for reasons explained TWICE above. Here is one of these examples:



Also highlighted is my clear willingness to MOVE ON with this thread. I'm not bothered if I messed up that script. I just want to continue.

[fordgt40]

Jack

"Any ideas?"

Yes, give Jim the courtesy of a proper reply to his last post - his investement deserves this.

David

EDIT 22/08/2010 12:53 - Since Jack has now severely edited his original post #61 (without direct indication), this reply makes little sense, but is left in to "keep the gist of the thread"

[deering]

_____________________________________

[Boeing 747 Flyer]

WAG?

Jack

"Any ideas?"

Yes, give Jim the courtesy of a proper reply to his last post - his investement deserves this.

David

I am, yet again, sorry for trying.

It's hard you know when you're on a very very very tight time schedule?

I am trying to follow your path Jim, but I'm wondering what is next?

Every detail is important. Do those conditions cover all the requirements as we stated them? Does the script accurately reflect them?

- LED  Blinks if Precipitation is MORE than 3

- LED  Lights if Precipitation is  <= 3 
          and
  LED stops blinking

- LED is OFF if there is no Turbulence (=0)

Keep going, Jack, we're almost there for this part.

Jim.

The script does accurately reflect what I want, as far as I can see.

[fordgt40]

Jack

Do not apologise for trying. I recall when HSBC took over Midland Bank, the comment was made how they (Midland) could invest so much time correcting things rather than investing in getting it right first time - I was a little hurt, but learnt the value of that statement.
Sacrificing a little haste to gain a good foundation for the future is not a failure. Jim is giving you sound advice, please persevere, assuming that you wish too

Regards

David

[deering]

____________________________

[Boeing 747 Flyer]

Jack,

I didn't realise there was a time schedule. Seems like there's not enough room in that schedule to learn SIOC.

There sure is Jim.

I was actually very interested in following your route. We got to post #61 before the "attacks" began. I did actually answer your question in that post, I just added a bit of my own experiemtnation. I have now deleted all associated text, just leaving my reply for your previous post.

I would like it if the last six posts were to be forgotten and to continue on this journey.

[deering]

_____________________________

[Boeing 747 Flyer]

Dear John,

I'm afraid the route will be too long for you; much remains to be done. Besides, it's obvious that we have different objectives. Also, you've been rewriting history with the edits to your posts.

Jim

I have NOT rewritten anything with my edits. Unfortunately, it seems you haven't been reading the reasons WHY I edited SOME of my posts. Hmmm... You, not reading? Isn't that ironic...

"Careful desk-checking" you say... I think you just ate your own words.

[Boeing 747 Flyer]

In other words, I am sorry for running ahead. If you still want to showcase your method I will be happy to follow it.