I completely agree with you. I have FS9 airport enhancements, so i guess i just need to look into environment enhancements as well.
I really like the graphics in FSX, but it's just frustrating to work with.
Printable View
Yes, I think Il give it more time until I go back to FSX. For one there isnt any aircraft for it yet which is good for flight dynamics etc like FS9 with the PMDG. And I have 0 problems with autopilot, autothrottle etc, turn rates, autoland, ILS capture etc.
Im working now at the moment so this will all have to wait till im finished.
Good luck !
One thing I want to point out is that there are a lot of ILS approaches in FSX that do not line up properly. CYVR 26R & CYYJ 27 are ones that I can think of right now. I have found others.
Yes we have found that out alright. I have reverted back to FS9 now. I just wanted to fly without problems.
[QUOTE=SAS541;54889]
I've read a lot on the internet that it is because MS used newer GPS data for the world and that shifted the airports to more accurate positions in FSX, but left the ILS coordinates etc from FS9, which is why they are out of whack, but i am not 100% sure of this.
Is there anyone out there using PM and FSX that is not having any problems with ILS landings?
QUOTE]
I think it is pretty much a given that FSX & ILS are not a good combination. Some ILS approaches are OK and many are not. My experience is that you are either offset from centre line or else the plane takes a steep climb just as it intercepts the glideslope and then it tries to descend, but by then it's too late and the only choice is to take over with a steep dive to re-capture the glide slope. I've seen these problems in CYVR, KSEA, PHNL so far.
Maurice