SIOC "IF" Question

Hi Jim,

As far as I can see, that script looks good to me. Have I made an error? I cannot see anything visually wrong.

EDIT: This post was edited, for reasons explained TWICE above. Here is one of these examples:

http://i822.photobucket.com/albums/z...uspheric/g.jpg

Also highlighted is my clear willingness to MOVE ON with this thread. I'm not bothered if I messed up that script. I just want to continue.

Jack

"Any ideas?"

Yes, give Jim the courtesy of a proper reply to his last post - his investement deserves this.

David

EDIT 22/08/2010 12:53 - Since Jack has now severely edited his original post #61 (without direct indication), this reply makes little sense, but is left in to "keep the gist of the thread"

_____________________________________

WAG?

Quote:

---

Jack

"Any ideas?"

Yes, give Jim the courtesy of a proper reply to his last post - his investement deserves this.

David

---

I am, yet again, sorry for trying.

It's hard you know when you're on a very very very tight time schedule?:shock:

I am trying to follow your path Jim, but I'm wondering what is next?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by deering

Every detail is important. Do those conditions cover all the requirements as we stated them? Does the script accurately reflect them?

Code:

---

- LED  Blinks if Precipitation is MORE than 3

- LED  Lights if Precipitation is  <= 3
          and
  LED stops blinking

- LED is OFF if there is no Turbulence (=0)

---

Keep going, Jack, we're almost there for this part.

Jim.

---

The script does accurately reflect what I want, as far as I can see.

Jack

Do not apologise for trying. I recall when HSBC took over Midland Bank, the comment was made how they (Midland) could invest so much time correcting things rather than investing in getting it right first time - I was a little hurt, but learnt the value of that statement.
Sacrificing a little haste to gain a good foundation for the future is not a failure. Jim is giving you sound advice, please persevere, assuming that you wish too

Regards

David

____________________________

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by deering

Jack,

I didn't realise there was a time schedule. Seems like there's not enough room in that schedule to learn SIOC.

---

There sure is Jim;).

I was actually very interested in following your route. We got to post #61 before the "attacks" began. I did actually answer your question in that post, I just added a bit of my own experiemtnation. I have now deleted all associated text, just leaving my reply for your previous post.

I would like it if the last six posts were to be forgotten and to continue on this journey.

_____________________________

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by deering

Dear John,

I'm afraid the route will be too long for you; much remains to be done. Besides, it's obvious that we have different objectives. Also, you've been rewriting history with the edits to your posts.

Jim

---

I have NOT rewritten anything with my edits. Unfortunately, it seems you haven't been reading the reasons WHY I edited SOME of my posts. Hmmm... You, not reading? Isn't that ironic...:rolleyes:

"Careful desk-checking" you say... I think you just ate your own words.

In other words, I am sorry for running ahead. If you still want to showcase your method I will be happy to follow it.