PDA

View Full Version : PMRJ Update 92



N242AM
12-09-2008, 08:26 AM
Can someone explain what "Release" means in the latest version 92?

How does that explain what is different from version 91?

Tomlin
12-09-2008, 10:16 AM
I was wondering the same thing too! Not sure. I tried to install and run this morning but didnt have enough time to test it yet.

N242AM
12-09-2008, 03:31 PM
I suppose paying for the Commercial support would get me the information?

Denis
12-09-2008, 03:59 PM
Hi,

The first difference I can see is that the terrain display WORKS !!! :p

So, I hope that the pressure and pressure rate will work in the next release.

Best regards

Denis

N242AM
12-09-2008, 05:23 PM
If they do not work now, why would you need to wait several more months for them to work?

Kris Stow
12-09-2008, 06:47 PM
Im not sure either what "Release" means. I don't think it has to do with the terrain function but maybe for the problem of the waypoints, at least I hope.

Every now and then in v91 when plugging in a flight plan the PMRJ would show it but a couple of the way points would be around the world and back although when coming to those WP's it would continue on the original path. wish they would give us the attention like the Boeing or Airbus. Just my opinion, don't mean to hurt anyones feelings.

Eric can you confirm that your way points are still not acting right with v92?

N242AM
12-09-2008, 09:03 PM
Why would you be concerned about hurting someones feelings?

You paid the asking price for the PMRJ software and I'm sure you expected it to be in a completed state.

Why are we tip-toeing around the obvious? We want PM to finish the software we purchased! Not in five or ten years either.

Kris Stow
12-13-2008, 08:22 PM
Any more info about the update from v91 to 92?

Trevor Hale
12-13-2008, 09:25 PM
Why would you be concerned about hurting someones feelings?

You paid the asking price for the PMRJ software and I'm sure you expected it to be in a completed state.

Why are we tip-toeing around the obvious? We want PM to finish the software we purchased! Not in five or ten years either.

Please be very careful with your comments here...

All of us (including myself) purchased the PM software knowing the current state of it. We made the decision to purchase the software the way it was, we all know it is work in progress. Any complaining in this forum is not appropriate.

Please lets keep this topic on track.

Best regards,

Trev

XOrionFE
12-21-2008, 07:16 AM
Hmmmmm

Kind of interesting that there has been no reply to the questions yet. And Trevor, I disagree. If a product has issues then it is reasonable for those who have paid for it to expect those issues to be corrected whether they knew of them when they purchased or not. I just paid for PMRJ recently as well and did not expect to hear some of the things I have been hearing about it. That said, when someone asks what is corrected in a newer release I think that is a very reasonable request. Why no answer?

And, if MYCOCKPIT.ORG is going to be about advertising and giving vendors a place to showcase their wares as well as provide a forum for users of those products to post issues and share knowledge then MYCOCKPIT.ORG should be a little more aggressive with its sponsors and less demeaning to those users who have spent their hard earned cash and ask legitimate questions.

I run an 18 million dollar company with over 4000 customers so I know a little something about customer service and none of the requests I have heard from users on this forum are unreasonable whether they expected when buying the product that there were issues or not. We all expect those issues to be addressed in good time.

Scott

Tomlin
12-21-2008, 09:17 AM
At this time I'm having no issues with way points, as I just adjust the range on the ND and it seems to sort it out IF it messes up. Other than that the only issue I have with the software other than it being far from complete (which as was pointed out, I fully knew about), I really wish the flight director didn't do its weird slanting to the left side when in certain modes. However, it just occurred to me that it may be due to their not being a 'MCP' software in place for it. Im wondering if those who use the PMBGC's MCP would have a FD that behaves better?