Results 11 to 20 of 34
Thread: CDU Procedures bug?
-
04-02-2007, 03:03 PM #11
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Holley, New York U.S.A.
- Posts
- 1,776
LNav is not approach mode!! No one said you didn't know Lnav. I say you have no idea what you are talking about with PM because you do not own it nor have you tried the demos. Until then you have no idea what you are talking about as far as PM is concerned!
Bob Reed
-
04-02-2007, 04:05 PM #12
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Italy
- Posts
- 204
From PM support:
Hello,
thank you for this. I will try to reach Stefan to understand whether he is
using the right converter.
Ciao
Enrico
-
04-02-2007, 04:08 PM #13
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Italy
- Posts
- 204
-
04-02-2007, 04:40 PM #14
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 66
Excuse me, but you are not understanding what I'm trying to get across here. I was saying that user who posted this thing couldn't fly a dme arc STAR approach using LNAV/CDU together - i am not talking about APP mode. The CDU is involved in LNAV, that is what I was saying.
I know what LNAV is from other programs such as PMDG - don't try and put words into my mouth please. Just because I don't have PM doesn't mean I don't know how A/P/MCP works, I am very familiar with the sequence from other programs and I know how the systems should behave. It seems clearly that they are not working properly according to the people here. The aircraft should fly a path without deviation when in LNAV according to the STAR entered into the CDU.
-
04-02-2007, 04:44 PM #15
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 66
-
04-02-2007, 05:42 PM #16
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Holley, New York U.S.A.
- Posts
- 1,776
Now it is you who are putting words in someones mouth. Here is the DIRECT quote that I made "Until then you have no idea what you are talking about as far as PM is concerned!" IN REGARDS TO PM nothing more.....
Bob Reed
-
04-02-2007, 06:15 PM #17
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 66
Em, PM is supposed to simulate the LNAV function that is found in aircraft systems - i know those sytems and according to people's posts here, PM isn't behaving like a LNAV system should at this time.
-
04-02-2007, 07:36 PM #18
Bob - which version of CDU are you using, and does that work with the latest navdata?
Another issue I'm noticing with the MCP is that LVL CHG is very unreliable, if not downright hazardous. It commands strange climb/descent profiles (illogical) and huge speed increases on descent - when it should be commanding A/T at idle. I have to use V/S all the time now when not using VNAV.
-
04-02-2007, 07:44 PM #19
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Holley, New York U.S.A.
- Posts
- 1,776
Hi Nic... I am about to go downstairs and I will let you know what versions of all the software I am running.
Bob Reed
-
04-02-2007, 07:51 PM #20
Nic,
Just for information Here are my Versions, and I don't seem to be having issues.
MCP Ver 410
GC Ver 436
PM SYS Ver 84
PM FMS Ver 372
Regards,
Trev________________________
Trevor Hale
Similar Threads
-
Sharing of procedures
By Anders Eriksson in forum PM General Q & AReplies: 5Last Post: 03-13-2006, 04:42 PM -
Re: Procedures SID/STAR's
By John Gayford in forum PM General Q & AReplies: 0Last Post: 03-12-2006, 02:02 AM -
Re: Procedures SID/STAR's
By Enrico Schiratti in forum PM General Q & AReplies: 3Last Post: 02-08-2006, 01:50 PM -
Re: Procedures SID/STAR's
By Jan Pemoeller in forum PM General Q & AReplies: 0Last Post: 02-05-2006, 03:26 PM
Candid connections: Platform for casual relationships Live Women Prime Сasual Dating
Super Сasual Dating - Genuine...