Page 30 of 32 FirstFirst ... 2026272829303132 LastLast
Results 291 to 300 of 312

Thread: A320 FMGS B52

  1. #291
    2000+ Poster - Never Leaves the Sim
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    France,Nice
    Posts
    2,606

    Re: A320 FMGS B52

    Hello,

    A news version was just released
    http://www.jeehell.org/A320FMGS_B52.4.0.exe
    Or with the updater.

    -Fixed more VNAV bugs on profile computations, VDEV tracking
    -More work on C* law & Autopilot behavior
    -Improved high speed and low speed protections
    -Added NO PORTBALE DEVICES ECAM option
    -Solved ENG ANTIICE issue working only on one engine
    -Enhanced networking peroformance a bit in some cases
    -Improved some ND route drawings
    -Fixed TO/LDG MEMO in regards to flaps position sometimes not detected
    -Fixed some crashes in EGPWS
    -Fixed some possible issues with sound modules when using specific sound outputs (not default one)

    Regards

  2. #292
    300+ Forum Addict asessa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Salerno , Italy
    Posts
    418

    Re: A320 FMGS B52

    Thank you JL!

  3. #293
    300+ Forum Addict asessa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Salerno , Italy
    Posts
    418

    Re: A320 FMGS B52

    First time with new version.. all was ok.

  4. #294
    75+ Posting Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    113

    Re: A320 FMGS B52

    Hi JL, first of all thank you very much for you ongoing development.

    Ive made 2 testflights with the new Version and its running smooth and nice. It seems that you even have resolved the issue of the oscillating engines. Ive flown at FL 250 with actual weather over nothern Germany. There was a very Little oscillation but it seems this was caused by a strong crosswind at that FL. Ive climbed up to FL 390 where the athmosphere was less turbulent and i stayed at that FL for 20 min at mach 0,79. The engines where running very calm and continous without oscillation. At least the CFMs because ive not tested the IAE yet.

    Thank you for this step forward.

    Salut
    Bernd

  5. #295
    300+ Forum Addict asessa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Salerno , Italy
    Posts
    418

    Re: A320 FMGS B52

    I tested it with IAE and i can confirm your impressions

  6. #296
    75+ Posting Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    113

    Re: A320 FMGS B52

    After some additional legs i have to say, that the Oscillation of the engines is not completly resolved. Ive made a longer leg from EDDS to LEBL at FL 350. At this FL the engines where oscillating a little (lets say between 83 to 86 % N1). Not as much as with the former version of FMGS but still there. At that FL i had a stady headwind without any turbulence which could have caused the Oscillation.

    Salut
    Bernd

  7. #297
    150+ Forum Groupie
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Bremen / Germany
    Posts
    219

    Re: A320 FMGS B52

    Thanks, JL, for the new version. I am trying to download it since Tuesday this week. On Tuesday it took more than 2 hours and in the end the installer said it's corrupted. Since then I am having problems to re-download at all. Maybe there is a different server which I could try?

    Thanks
    Stefan

  8. #298
    150+ Forum Groupie
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Bremen / Germany
    Posts
    219

    Re: A320 FMGS B52

    Hi,

    I always have the problem that I am not getting all altitude callouts during final. I think I have found the reason now: As long as I enter 200 as DH on APPROACH page, I am getting all callouts as 2500, 200, 1000, 500, 400, 100 above. But I am missing the 200 and all callouts below.

    As long as I do not enter anything as DH on APPROACH page, I am getting all callouts fine. Maybe anyone else encountering the same?

    Thanks
    Stefan

  9. #299
    75+ Posting Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    113

    Re: A320 FMGS B52

    hi Stefan, some questions: You mean if you put exactly 200 now callouts are made, or even if you put 220 or 180 or else? Do you really mean DH not MDA? if yes it could be its maybe realated to that, because with MDA the baro-altimeter is used for the height and with DH the radar altimeter is in use.

    Cheers
    Bernd

  10. #300
    150+ Forum Groupie
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Bremen / Germany
    Posts
    219

    Re: A320 FMGS B52

    Hi Bernd,

    I mean DH where I put 200 in nearly every flight to have the minimums 200 feet above ground, no matter on which elevation the airport is sitting (entered like here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/d-aize/23300608563/).

    I have not tried 220 or 180, I will do that.

    Stefan