03-29-2011, 09:27 PM #1
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Sao Paulo - Brazil
Boeing and Embry-Riddle use PM . What for?
Does anybody have any idea why these companies use Project Majenta? If for professional use , are they satisfied ? Like I said before, there are some mistakes that is impossible not noticing , beginning with engine start where that red mark stays in EGT after engine stabilizes( Is that so difficult to eliminate?) . Following that, the N1 green dot in N1 ARC that should always represent the takeoff maximum continuous thrust , when selecting a temperature for a reduced takeoff ( R-TO) , the green dot follows N1 reduced setting (wrong) . Sorry guys , but for proffesional usage I donīt recommend.
03-29-2011, 09:52 PM #2
Re: Boeing and Embry-Riddle use PM . What for?
Just to throw this out there but what if the versions that Boeing and Embry-riddle use are not the exact same versions that you have. If I was a multi billion dollar company and asked a software company that I had purchased from to fix a few errors i bet it would get done. That does not mean that it gets fixed for everyone else. just my .02 cents I could be totally wrong.Mike G.
By azza2010 in forum Welcome to MyCockpit New here? Introduce Yourself!Replies: 1Last Post: 11-24-2010, 01:29 PM
By edo17982 in forum Off Site Articles For SaleReplies: 0Last Post: 06-08-2010, 10:12 AM
By KLM077 in forum General Builder Questions All Aircraft TypesReplies: 6Last Post: 10-15-2009, 12:40 PM