Thread: FS2004 or FSX
06-10-2008, 04:45 PM #1
- Join Date
- May 2006
FS2004 or FSX
Yes I know endles discussion but I don't seem to be able to make the choise. I have both of them and I have to decide which one I will use for my sim. I think that FS2004 is more framerate friendly then FSX so I will need to decide if it is worth to use FSX, especially wat is better the in FS2004.
Wat are your experiences, wat are the good reasons to choose FSX?
I will be running Vista on all computers normally.
I also don't want to install both of them to keep the machines as fast as possible, and it is allready complicated enough as it is.
I allready looked around on reviews and tested a bit myself, but having information from you guys is the best resource there is
06-10-2008, 05:13 PM #2
I'm FSX all the way. It was worth it.
I was running both, but after SP1 and Acceleration there was no comparison.God's in command, I'm just the Pilot.
06-10-2008, 06:09 PM #3
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- canton ga.
If you are going to run Vista then FSX is the best choice.
06-10-2008, 06:29 PM #4
I have to vote for FS9 mostly because the Dreamfleet 727 doesn't yet exist for FSX.
I also don't care for Vista and ordered a brand new system with XP Pro installed from NewEgg.com
I would have had to spend twice what I did to get the same performance for FSX that I'm getting with FS9, and software add-on's were a big issue with me.
I did not want to purchase all of my scenery again for those that were, or are available, and what would I do without a compatible 727? My sim would be on indefinate hold.
Surely this debate occured earlier when FS8 vs FS9 was released too. But back then, I'm pretty sure XP was available and not a new operating system as well as a new FS product.Boeing Skunk Works
Remember...140, 250, and REALLY FAST!
We don't need no stinkin' ETOPS!
Powered by FS9 & BOEING
06-10-2008, 11:16 PM #5
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Gold Coast-AUSTRALIA
Gooday Marnix, only one way to go, and that is FSX. I would also suggest to stay with XP at this stage as there is no advantage to go with Vista. If you check out all the posts by Nick Needham, you will get the best results from XP. As we all know this can change, and especcially with new CPU's on the way later this year, but unfortunately you have to make a descision now and obviously this will be different in 6 months time. We just never catch up.
You can now buy good value CPU's and video cards etc. at a reasonable price at the moment which will run FSX extremely well provided you tune your system well.
06-11-2008, 04:39 AM #6
right now I am sticking with FS9 on WinXP as I have invested a significant amount of cash in the add-ons (photo scenery, CRJ, British airports, flight environment, traffic, etc) to upgrade to FSX would involved a CPU upgrade too..... as Brian points out below, you can never catch up - unless you have a lot of funds.
I had the same thing with FS2000/2002 - bought loads of add-ons and then had to trade up.
I've tried FSX on my home PC and it crashed it several times so I have decided in the mean time to stick with FS9 as I am not at a point where I need or want to upgrade my home PC just for flying.Cheers
06-11-2008, 07:13 AM #7
If you can afford a PC that can run FSX, then there is no question here...FSX all the way. I was very reluctant to switch at first, and I still have some issues with FSX on a flight deck which were not there in FS9, but there is no way I can ever go back (I used to have both on my PC but I removed FS9 altogether now).
ps I'm running FSX with WinXP and it runs very well, but I would still advise to get the fastest hardware you can afford.
06-11-2008, 04:38 PM #8
I heard that Windows XP SP3 runs 100% faster that Vista SP1. (CNET.Com). I will be staying with XP Pro and FS2004 for a while. Performance is all about CPU and graphic card in Flight Sim. Oh and enough RAM.
Link to CNET article: http://news.cnet.com/Windows-XP-outs...tml?tag=news.1
06-16-2008, 12:22 PM #9
- Join Date
- May 2006
Ok, it will be FSX then.
I only installed vista on 1 pc so far, so I still can switch back to XP. I am using pentium 4 pc with 2 gig. I need 3 of these as I use Wideview.
Good tip about XP instead of Vista. I was going to use Vista because I figured that FSX would run faster on this.[
06-16-2008, 05:28 PM #10
The CNET article is a bit of a worry - but it is out-of-date. I read a recent article by another tech site (trying to remember the reference) which tested XP-SP3 against the actual Vista-SP!. They found that the performance is pretty much equal now.Nic D'Alessandro
737NG builder (Hobart, Australia)
By Nick1150 in forum General Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004 (FS9)Replies: 5Last Post: 05-31-2011, 11:47 AM
By ddimm in forum Projector SolutionsReplies: 1Last Post: 11-19-2010, 06:10 PM
By richard hutchinson in forum Computer Hardware SetupReplies: 1Last Post: 01-08-2010, 03:12 PM
By Drewsta in forum Computer Hardware SetupReplies: 2Last Post: 09-16-2009, 05:13 PM
By spitfire9 in forum I/O Interfacing Hardware and SoftwareReplies: 0Last Post: 01-30-2007, 05:08 PM