Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 36 of 36
  1. #31
    300+ Forum Addict oal331's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Athens - Greece
    Posts
    379
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    Quote Originally Posted by andarlite View Post
    See this for how FSX utilizes multi-cores:

    http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archiv...tel-quote.aspx

    Regards,
    Henry
    Hi Henry,

    the link does not work for me, can you copy/paste the article?

    Thanks

    Eddie

  2. #32
    150+ Forum Groupie andarlite's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    260
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    Quote Originally Posted by oal331 View Post
    Hi Henry,

    the link does not work for me, can you copy/paste the article?

    Thanks

    Eddie

    Here's his homepage:

    http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/default.aspx

    Highly recommended blog as Phil Taylor is a PM for FSX development.

    Here's the article:


    Today Intel announced their new 2.93G QX6800 Quad Core processor here.
    As part of this press release, Aces Studio participated with a quote about our improved multi-core support in SP1. The quote stated
    “The latest version of Microsoft Flight Simulator* X, Service Pack One (SP1), due out later this month, is a great match for the extreme multi-core processing delivered by the new Intel Core 2 Extreme quad-core processor”
    and
    “Flight Sim X SP1 greatly increases multicore utilization and will scale as more threads are available leading to reduced load times as well as frame rate improvements and greater visual complexity during flight. The Flight Simulator team at Microsoft is pleased to work with Intel to provide our end users with a great gaming experience."
    And I wanted to take some time and explain what this means for FSX and FSX flyers.

    Our multi-core support will take advantage of both 2 and 4 cores today, and more cores in the future when they become available via a config setting. This is for both Intel and AMD processors.

    At load time, we run the terrain loading on threads across the cores. This can result in reduced load times, the actual percent reduction can vary but it could be reduced by as much as 1/3.

    At render time, we run the terrain texture synthesis on threads across the cores. During flight on multi-core machines, as terrain and terrain textures are loaded you will notice significant multi-core usage. As all tiles are loaded, the multi-core usage will fall off, this is expected. As the terrain is re-lit, approximately every minute, you will see multi-core usage increase. As you bank and load terrain tiles, or as you fly forward and force a load of more terrain tiles, you will see the multi-core usage increase.

    At render time, we now perform more extensive batching of objects to reduce our API Draw calls. The batch rebuilds are also performed on a thread and scheduled on cores.

    For those of you on single core machines, we did do some performance work to benefit you as well. The batching work will help even on a single core. Plus we made some changes to animations to make them perform better and we modified how we draw trees to reduce API SetTexture calls.

    So we really tried to hit all the wickets with our performance work. I still don’t want to make any final FPS gain claims, and will stick with my conservative 20%. We expect it to be more, but we need to get Beta2 out and see where we are.

    As far as the release date for SP1, we need to get Beta2 out and see what remains. The last day of April is still possible, but any significant Beta2 bugs will cause us to fix them and delay – we want SP1 to be right for the community and are not tied to a date.

    Note - hyperthreaded is not multi-core. Our current plan is to treat HT machines as single-core since we noticed extensive collisions between threads which caused stutters.

    Posted: Monday, April 09, 2007 3:43 PM by Phil Taylor


    Regards,
    Henry

  3. Thanks Trevor Hale, Matt Olieman, Padraig thanked for this post
  4. #33
    150+ Forum Groupie Padraig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Eire
    Posts
    221
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    Great article, thanks for posting! Totally proves the point about this thread.

  5. #34
    300+ Forum Addict oal331's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Athens - Greece
    Posts
    379
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    Henri,

    thank you very much for the copy. That was a very helpful article.

    Eddie

  6. #35
    Executive Vice President, MyCockpit


    Matt Olieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ocala, FL USA
    Posts
    2,884
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    Very interesting, thanks for the info. Henry, much appreciated.

  7. #36
    75+ Posting Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Berkshire, UK
    Posts
    118
    Contribute If you enjoy reading the
    content here, click the below
    image to support MyCockpit site.
    Click Here To Contribute To Our Site

    Excellent link but the story is a little more complicated for the end-user than what Phil Taylor explicitly states.

    We all have to ask ourselves if we have a "Hyperthreaded Enabled Processor" and a motherboard with a "HT Technology enabled Chipset" installed to take advantage of the performance improvements and throughput gains that Phil Taylor describes!!
    By examining the BIOS this can quickly be determined as Hyperthreading is enabled in the BIOS. If the line does not appear you do have not a Hyperthreaded Processor!

    I discovered last year that I had to wait for a suitable cost effective processor to become available.

    I would draw your attention to the following link to Intels site that might well be most helpful to those who want to take advantage of all the hyperthreading facilities in SP1.

    http://www.intel.com/products/ht/hyp...c_requirements

    Hope this helps!

    Bill.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Similar Threads

  1. Motion software on a one of the 4 cores
    By Doon1 in forum Cockpit Parts and Motion Platforms
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-22-2009, 11:01 AM