i would like others who have tried this software to confirm my experiences, so i hope someone else can also post their opinions on how this software behaves.
Printable View
i would like others who have tried this software to confirm my experiences, so i hope someone else can also post their opinions on how this software behaves.
Im using it for the FMC, ND and Lower EICAS. I can tell you it works great runs smoothly and hasnt given me any problems. My MCP dosent work with Andrews MCP so Im not currently using it. Although when I did I had issues with engaging LNAV.
Other than that its a good looking well working package, Personally I would prefer a higher level of hardware interface for other brands of MCP's
hi, its definitely a very good looking package, however i was disappointed with no SID/STAR features on the FMC - out of interest, what 737 do you use, is it the default 737 or another 737?
I guess I should elaborate. I dont think Andrew intended for it to be a super detailed package for builders. For people looking for a step up at a reasonable price its great and serves a good purpose. Ive used the defualt 737 and POSKY model.
I do find the MCP needs some tuning but as I said earlier for someone looking for a step up on a budget it is great. At some point I plan on fully implementing Prosim and theAerosoft software is a great interim choice for me
hello, just an update, all those issues i had with the plane not holding lnav or vnav or heading hold, was due to my microsoft fsx game, i uninstalled the whole thing, reinstalled it and now the aerosoft works perfectly and Andrew is also very good in helping as his replies are often quick and he is genuinely interested in helping you, so very good package (although the default 737 is abit finnicky at times).
thats good news, thanks for the update. Nice to hear the support is good as well